Mediatization, polarization, and intolerance (between environments, media, and circulation)

Jairo G. Ferreira 318 on what to do (abductive inferences about tomorrow, today, and yesterday), all involved in perspectives in face of uncertainty, aiming at financial valuation, in integrated systems worldwide. The conflict in these markets is strong (from the small ones to the global - for example, now about the access to the 5G system), polarizations occur, including between “sharks” and “sardines 8 .” However, the system (called financial), due to its regulations, logics, and inferential potentials, survives. It is not known to the date 9 . It is a landscape of the financial market, which manages all capitalist markets. Clearly, it is not the same reality for cultural and political markets. To differentiate these markets, one issue is to know if antagonism, the basis of polarization, is a logical derivation per se. Our hypothesis is that polarization derives not from logic it- self, but from what it adds to the dimension of values (psycho- logical, anthropological, sociological). It is the order of cultural, economic, and political mediations. If it were only logic, the ar- gumentative resolution would solve the system’s crisis. However, cultural and political markets, due to their greater complexities, are not reduced to the possibilities of ob- jectification of financial markets. The values of these markets are of a difficult exchangeability. In the culture, the “higher rule” is not economic valorization. Although it can also manage the interactions and objects traded in these markets, we prefer the hypothesis that, there, the greatest value is the gift; in politi- cal markets, even with crossings with economic ones, the cen- tral rule is the construction of rules and mediations between all markets, internal and external. Here Bourdieu’s criticism is placed: part of these markets are subordinated to the systems of the economic market (BOURDIEU, 2016). On the other hand, even if they do not constitute a whole system, it is possible to identify several operating subsystems. We suggest, in the context of this hypothesis, that, even with different rules between the markets, the current question, 8 Retrieved from: https://economia.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,a-revolta -das-sardinhas,70003600862 9 Our hypothesis, presented in another article, is that the materialization of the algorithms is the basis of capitalism. In the history of the species, the permanent materialization remakes the game. See 2020.