Networks, Society, and Polis: Epistemological Approaches on Mediatization

Jairo Ferreira 272 institutional ‘leaders,’ autonomy, etcetera), also in the form of conflicts (as in: who are you to communicate like this?). In this sense, the materialized production system, pre- sented in the form of models (diagrams), should identify, if they occur, algorithms for content management, programming, indexing, and interactions. With these limits arising from the object to be visited (the means in a small constellation), the is- sue of horizontal relations, minimization of differences, reduc - tion of rivalry, search for interactional symmetries, etcetera , can also be addressed by the actors involved when in produc- tion and/or reception circuits. This circuit, when in digital networks, is observed in interactions and communication paradoxes (it is not possible not to communicate, but communicating reveals paradoxes), fed back by individual actions, but they occur under the mantle of performing, which allows us to speak in a dynamic system, driven by continuous interactions, subject to analysis, which manifest, or not, bonds built, stimulated, reinforced, in their conflicts and symptoms. Elective affinities amor fati and odium fati The algorithms that agency the interaction means have indications that the targeting may be interpreted in Bourdieu’s perspective. The limiting case forces one to question the ap- pearances of the direct effect of demand on sup- ply or of supply on demand, and to consider in a new light all the encounters between the logic of goods production and the logic of taste production through which the universe of appropriate, appro- priating things – objects, people, knowledge, mem - ories etc. – is constituted. The limit of these coin- cidences of homologous structures and sequences which bring about the concordance between a so- cially classified person and the socially classified things or person’s which ‘suit’ hi mis represented by all acts of co-option in fellow-feeling, friend-