From shared semantics to the excavations of what operates, converses and transforms us 17 There is a whole work to be done to try to deconstruct what constitutes the interfaces; that is, to enter the guts of the interfaces, to go deeper, to get the algorithms, the computer codes, the software. I think it is a work that requires the collaboration not only of sociologists and communication spe- cialists, but also of specialists in the world of information technology and, strictly speaking, the participation of mathematicians. I think we need interdisciplinary teams to work in the guts of the social web (Proulx et al., 2016, p. 38). This does not prevent Proulx from asking questions and offering answers about what algorithms are, linking this to the informational capitalism, approaching hypotheses that would be developed theoretically during the 10s of this century. Therefore, there are not few contributions of these works in terms of inference: • Expansion and concentration of media power, now at the global level, beyond the national frameworks of television corporations; • Capture of the free work of billions of users on the planet; • Data capture as a source of capitalization; • Adaptive processes in behavioral and discursive terms to the contexts of the media of networked interaction; • Regulation of the discursive and interactional flow by algorithms; • Emergence of new collectives of resistance and cultural production. ** The inferences above indicate transformations in so- cio-anthropological processes correlated to media processes, addressing the phenomena of platforms and algorithms. In these books, there is no reference to the term artificial intelligence. By taking up platforms, algorithms and artificial intelligence as a theme, the VI Mediatization Seminar sought new approximating
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjEzNzYz