Interactional digital algorithm 341 versity through communication is by developing lines of action – which generate mutual effects in both directions: from society to individuals and from individuals to society. Socially developed cultural patterns strongly direct the actions of individuals and social groups. At the same time, in- dividual actions and those of minority groups have some pos- sibility of influencing broader cultural patterns. The way these sectors and personal initiatives act to achieve this impact is by generating variations to general patterns. When circumstances, problems, and emerging social objectives offer some opportunity so that minority actions and discourses are seen as a valid solution and way forward to ad- dress what the established culture is unable to meet, they can be selected and thus achieve their insertion into the broader com- position of social praxis. Historically, depending on social circumstances, at times the impact of society on individuals and minorities has been strengthened; at other times, opportunities have opened for sectoral thinking and actions to be favored, achieving greater impact as a significant part of overarching patterns – changing society to a greater or lesser extent. This process of mutual im- pact results in a constant search for a variable balance between stability, which guarantees cultural continuity relevant to the species, and the space for adjustment, renewal, course correc- tions, and the discovery of objectives that go beyond the status quo. The previous challenges show that algorithms em- phasize probabilistic tendencies in their data collection, favoring previous social and individual choices – already reasonably stabilized. In other words: they tend to select what has already been selected. At the same time, they discourage creative learning, to the extent that it is automatic, and risk favoring a closed articulation of diversity. This corresponds to separating the variations, reducing their possibility of offering actions and discourse that can be selected to compose the more comprehensive patterns of so- cial praxis – unbalancing the flexibility of the mutual incidence between macro social patterns (comprehensive) and micro pat- terns (individual and sectoral groups). The top-down incidence
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjEzNzYz